Skip to main content

Second try with Scala and REST

As I mentioned in my previous post I tried to create a simple REST service with Scala and spray.io, but that turned out to be unbelievably difficult. A second try with Scala and REST turned out to be successful.

Play to the rescue


When my experiment with spray.io didn't work out I had an idea to try out Play 2 as a base to my REST service. Working with Play 2 was a walk in the park compared to spray.io even though not entirely painless but much easier and less frustrating.

Starting out with Play 2 was really quick thanks to a good documentation and examples that are up to date. Basically I just ran the command play new appName and started coding.

So far I have REST service and a in-memory implementation of todo tasks with some unit tests. REST service is all Play 2 with routes and a single application class. The current service layer implementation is a single class with tasks in a mutable Map where a individual task is a case class, so just some basic Scala code.

I really like Play 2 so far but I'm a bit concerned of how much dependencies Play 2 brings with it as default. Currently I have 92 jars in referenced libraries of my project, all from default initialization of play application. Sure some of these are test library dependencies but still that's a lot of libraries.

Unit testing Scala code


Play 2 automatically includes as a dependency the specs2 library that's a unit and acceptance testing library for Scala. I had never used specs2 and the bdd style definition of tests was a bit odd to me but I decided to give it a try.

After a few initial wtf's I got the hang of it pretty quickly and was able create some basic unit tests for my service implementation. I've only scratched the surface with specs2 but it seems to do the job and has quick learning curve and so far the provided documentation has been enough to get me going.

What's next


Next step in my adventures in the world of Scala will be to try use some real data storage to persist the todo applications data. I think I'll try out with MongoDB and after that some other very different alternatives like Redis and MariaDB. 


Code shared publicly


As I use code and examples provided by others I too am sharing my code and putting it publicly reviewed by others. It's all shared through my github account at https://github.com/jorilytter/simple-todo, feel free take a look.

Popular posts from this blog

Simple code: Immutability

Immutability is a special thing that in my mind deserves a short explanation and praise. If you're familiar with functional programming you surely recognice the concept of immutability because it's a key ingredient of the paradigm. In the world of object oriented programming it's not as used and as easy to use approach but there are ways to incorporate immutability to parts of the code and I strongly suggest you to do so. Quick intro to immutablity The basic idea of immutability is unchangeable data.  Lets take a example. We have a need to modify a object's property but because the object is immutable we can't just change value but instead we make a copy of the object and while making the copy we provide the new value for the copy. In code it looks something like this. val pencil = Product(name = "Pencil", category = "Office supply") val blackMarker = pencil.copy(name = "Black marker") The same idea can be applied in functions and metho

Sharing to help myself

It's been a while since my last post but I have a good excuse. I've been in a new customer project (well new for me) for two months now and have absorbed a lot of new information on the technology stack and the project itself. This time I'll be sharing a short post about sharing code and how it can help the one who's sharing the code. I'll be giving a real life example of how it happened to me. My story Back when I was implementing first version of my simple-todo REST-service I used Scala and Play framework for the service and specs2 for testing the implementation. Since then I've done a few other implementations of the service but I've continued to use specs2 as a testing framework. I wrote about my implementation and shared the post through various services and as a result someone forked my work and gave me some pointers on how I could improve my tests. That someone was Eric Torreborre  the man behind specs2 framework. I didn't take his ref

Simple code: Naming things

There are two hard things in programming and naming is one them. If you don't believe me ask Martin Fowler https://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html . In this post I'll be covering some general conventions for naming things to improve readability and understandabilty of the code. There are lots of things that need a name in programming. Starting from higher abstractions to lower we need to name a project, API or library, we probably need to name the source code repository, when we get to the code we need to name our modules or packages, we give names to classes, objects, interfaces and in those we name our functions or methods and within those we name our variables. Overall a lot of things to name. TLDR; Basic rule There's a single basic convention to follow to achiveve better, more descriptive naming of things. Give it a meaningful name i.e. don't use shorthands like gen or single letter variables like a, x, z instead tell what it represents, what it does